Service Quality, Trust, and Financial Behavior in Digital Banking: A Systematic Literature Review
Finance Innovations Digest

Finance Innovations Digest

Finance Innovations Digest aims to serve as a comprehensive platform for disseminating knowledge, insights, and...

Publishing Model

Open Access
This journal published by Integra Academic Press

Abstract

This study explores the relationships between service quality, trust, and financial behavior in the context of digital banking transformation. Using a systematic literature review (SLR) approach, twenty-five peer-reviewed journal articles indexed in Scopus and SINTA 1–2 were analyzed to synthesize evidence on customer trust formation, technology adoption, and behavioral outcomes in digital banking. The review identifies trust and perceived service quality as the strongest determinants of digital banking usage, while perceived security risk remains a critical barrier to adoption. Findings indicate that digital banking services, such as Qlola Internet Banking at Bank Rakyat Indonesia (BRI), enhance customers' financial management efficiency, including transaction monitoring, liquidity control, and decision-making accuracy. However, behavioral outcomes are significantly influenced by the users' trust level and their perceived reliability of digital platforms. The study contributes to understanding how digital service experience shapes financial discipline and long-term engagement in digital financial ecosystems.

 

Keywords: Customer Trust Digital Banking Financial Behavior Service Quality


References

Alalwan, A. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., & Williams, M. D. (2017). Consumer adoption of mobile banking in Jordan: Examining the role of usefulness, ease of use, perceived risk and self-efficacy. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 30(3), 409-428. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-04-2016-0102.

Amin, M. (2016). Internet banking service quality and its implication on e-customer satisfaction and e-customer loyalty. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 34(3), 280-306. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-10-2014-0139.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.

Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51-90. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519.

Kim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L., & Rao, H. R. (2009). Trust and satisfaction, two stepping stones for successful e-commerce relationships: A longitudinal exploration. Information Systems Research, 20(2), 237-257. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1080.0188.

Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2014). The economic importance of financial literacy: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(1), 5-44. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.52.1.5.

Makanyeza, C., & Mutambayashata, S. (2018). Consumers' acceptance and use of plastic money in Harare, Zimbabwe: Application of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology 2. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 36(2), 379-392. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-03-2017-0044.

Martins, C., Oliveira, T., & Popovič, A. (2014). Understanding the Internet banking adoption: A unified theory of acceptance and use of technology and perceived risk application. International Journal of Information Management, 34(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.06.002.

Mbama, C. I., & Ezepue, P. O. (2018). Digital banking, customer experience and bank financial performance: UK customers' perceptions. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 36(2), 230-255. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-11-2016-0181.

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Malhotra, A. (2005). E-S-QUAL: A multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality. Journal of Service Research, 7(3), 213-233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670504271156.

Rahi, S., Ghani, M. A., & Ngah, A. H. (2019). Integration of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology in internet banking adoption setting: Evidence from Pakistan. Technology in Society, 58, 101120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.03.003.

Raza, S. A., Umer, A., Qureshi, M. A., & Dahri, A. S. (2020). Internet banking service quality, e-customer satisfaction and loyalty: The modified e-SERVQUAL model. The TQM Journal, 32(6), 1443-1466. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-02-2020-0019.

Shaikh, A. A., & Karjaluoto, H. (2015). Mobile banking adoption: A literature review. Telematics and Informatics, 32(1), 129-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2014.05.003.

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.

Xiao, J. J. (2008). Applying behavior theories to financial behavior. In J. J. Xiao (Ed.), Handbook of Consumer Finance Research (pp. 69-81). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-75734-6_5.

Yousafzai, S. Y., Pallister, J. G., & Foxall, G. R. (2009). Multi-dimensional role of trust in Internet banking adoption. The Service Industries Journal, 29(5), 591-605. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060902719958.